Valeriy Martishev vs Myhalo Kovalov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do the players compare in second serve performance recently? Both Martishev and Kovalov have won 0% of second serve points in the past 6 months. This suggests neither has an edge in this area.
• What are the return game statistics? Recently, both players have struggled, with Martishev and Kovalov capturing 0% of second serve return points.
• Are the players effective under pressure? Both have saved 0% of breakpoints recently, indicating struggles in critical moments of matches.
• Overall, how do their match win percentages compare over the past year? Martishev has a 31.25% win rate, while Kovalov holds a 50% win rate, showing Kovalov has been more successful.
• What are their best surface statistics? Martishev performs best on Hard surfaces with a 31% win rate, whereas Kovalov excels more on Clay with a 43% win rate.
• At which tournament levels do they mainly play? Both compete primarily at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, but Kovalov has a higher win rate at 50% compared to Martishev's 31.25%.
• What is the average opponent quality each player faces? Martishev's average opponent rank is 53.75, while Kovalov's opponent rank is noted as 0, suggesting inconsistency in data collection or lower competition.
• Is deciding set performance significant between them? Martishev has won 67% of deciding sets in the last 12 months, whereas Kovalov hasn't won any deciding sets.
• Have they converted breakpoints well recently? Both sport a breakpoint conversion rate of 0%, indicating difficulties in taking control of matches at pivotal moments.

Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):

Based on the current statistics and trends, both Martishev and Kovalov display substantial vulnerabilities in their performances, particularly in the areas of second serve points, return game efficiency, and breakpoint conversion. These aspects point towards overall struggles in maintaining competitive edges in matches.

However, Kovalov's higher match win percentage over the past year indicates a greater consistency in securing victories. While both players have primarily participated in lower-tier tournaments, Kovalov's success rate stands out at 50%, presenting a notable advantage over Martishev's 31.25% in similar events.

Moreover, despite neither player showing notable strength on serve or returns, Kovalov's record on Clay surfaces could be an influential factor if the upcoming match is played on similar terrain.

Taking into account Martishev's stronger performance in deciding sets, if the match extends to a third set, it might present a challenging scenario for Kovalov.

Overall, given the comparative analysis and trends, Kovalov appears to have a slight edge and is the most likely winner for the upcoming match, provided he can handle scenarios that may lead to a deciding set effectively.